communication: be important with team mates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important with team mates 1.00
be important to team 0.86
be important in team 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(acknowledgement, be important to team)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(acknowledgement, be important to team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acknowledgement, be important to team)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important with team mates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important with team mates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(communication, be important with team mates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important with team mates) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acknowledgement, be important to team)