communication: be with people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with people 1.00
be with other people 0.95
be with people important 0.93
be with young people 0.89
be with young people important 0.87
help people 0.86
be difficult for people 0.80
be important around families 0.80
be hard for individuals 0.79
be better in person 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(failure, help people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(communication, be with people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(failure, help people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, help people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(failure, help people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be with people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(communication, be with people)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(communication, be with young people important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be difficult for people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important around families)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(communication, be difficult for people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(communication, be with young people important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(communication, be important around families)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communication, be difficult for people)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(communication, be with young people important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(communication, be important around families)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(communication, be difficult for people)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(communication, be with young people important)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be important around families)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(communication, be with people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(communication, be with people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(failure, help people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(communication, be with people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(failure, help people)