communication: differ from animal communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from animal communication 1.00
differ from mass communication 0.89
be different from communication 0.86
be in business world different from communication 0.82
be used in communication 0.81
be used for communication 0.81
be in communication 0.80
differ writing 0.79
be in business world different from everyday communication 0.78
be different from technical communication 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fundamental, be in communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fundamental, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fundamental, be in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fundamental, be in communication)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(infrared, be used in communication)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(infrared, be used for communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used for communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(communication, differ from animal communication)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(communication, differ from mass communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(communication, differ from mass communication)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(communication, be different from communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(communication, differ from mass communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(communication, be different from communication)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(communication, be different from communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(communication, be different from communication)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from mass communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fundamental, be in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in communication)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(infrared, be used for communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, differ from animal communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fundamental, be in communication)