communication: using total internal reflection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
using total internal reflection 1.00
using internal reflection 0.95
using total reflection 0.95
using reflection 0.89
be important in total quality management 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(communication, using total internal reflection)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in total quality management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important in total quality management)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(communication, be important in total quality management)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in total quality management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(communication, using total internal reflection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(communication, using total internal reflection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(communication, using total internal reflection)