company: group similar business

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.66
, market
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.62
, operator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.87
, department store
Weight: 0.68
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.65
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.63
, shop
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
group similar business 1.00
business with many customer 0.78
has business plan 0.76
be used to organize business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(department store, business with many customer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(department store, business with many customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(department store, business with many customer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(company, group similar business)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(company, be used to organize business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(company, has business plan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(company, has business plan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(company, has business plan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(company, be used to organize business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(company, has business plan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(company, be used to organize business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(company, be used to organize business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(company, group similar business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(company, group similar business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(company, group similar business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(department store, business with many customer)