company: thank customer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.66
, market
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.62
, operator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.87
, department store
Weight: 0.68
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.65
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.63
, shop
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
thank customer 1.00
business with many customer 0.80
be used to serve customer need 0.78
supply customer with product 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(shop, be used to serve customer need)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(department store, business with many customer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(department store, business with many customer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(department store, business with many customer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(shop, be used to serve customer need)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(shop, be used to serve customer need)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(company, thank customer)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(company, supply customer with product)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(company, supply customer with product)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(company, supply customer with product)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(company, supply customer with product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(company, thank customer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(company, thank customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(shop, be used to serve customer need)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(company, thank customer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(department store, business with many customer)