compete: is law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.53
, competitor
Weight: 0.45
, statement
Weight: 0.42
, source
Weight: 0.39
, site
Weight: 0.32
Siblings tap
Weight: 0.30
, leverage
Weight: 0.30
, opportunity
Weight: 0.29
, experience
Weight: 0.29
, task force
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is law 1.00
law of is cost 0.88
avoid law 0.86
is kc private law enforcement 0.80
is kc law enforcement 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, law of is cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(opportunity, law of is cost)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(opportunity, law of is cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(compete, is law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(compete, is law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(compete, is law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(compete, is law)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, law of is cost)