competition: be in market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in market 1.00
be in market good 0.95
be in market affect 0.92
is market system 0.92
affect market 0.92
be needed in market 0.92
be important part of market system 0.88
affect free market 0.88
is market structure 0.86
be in marketplace 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(competition, be in market)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(competition, be needed in market)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(competition, be in market affect)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in market good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in market affect)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(competition, is market structure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(competition, be needed in market)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(competition, be in marketplace)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, affect free market)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(competition, is market structure)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in marketplace)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(competition, be needed in market)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(competition, be in market affect)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(competition, is market structure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(competition, be in marketplace)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(competition, affect free market)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(competition, be in market affect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(competition, be in market good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(competition, be needed in market)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(competition, is market structure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(competition, be in market good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(competition, affect free market)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(competition, be in marketplace)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(competition, affect free market)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(competition, be in market good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(competition, be in market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(competition, be in market) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(competition, be in market)