competitiveness: wants to play game of chess

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, challenge
Weight: 0.49
, benefit
Weight: 0.45
, information
Weight: 0.45
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.33
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.31
, agriculture
Weight: 0.31
, chemistry
Weight: 0.31
, diversity
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to play game of chess 1.00
wants to play tennis 0.86
wants to play football 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(challenge, wants to play tennis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(competitiveness, wants to play football)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(competitiveness, wants to play football)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(competitiveness, wants to play game of chess) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)