competitor: analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents third party
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, advantage
Weight: 0.57
, business people
Weight: 0.56
Siblings player
Weight: 0.69
, target
Weight: 0.62
, supplier
Weight: 0.60
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis 1.00
is analysis 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(competitor, analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(competitor, is analysis)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(competitor, is analysis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(competitor, is analysis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(competitor, is analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(competitor, analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(competitor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(competitor, analysis)