complaint: be on activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents letter
Weight: 0.65
, evidence
Weight: 0.64
, meeting
Weight: 0.60
, email
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.70
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.63
, headache
Weight: 0.62
, argument
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on activity 1.00
be on criminal activity 0.87
be on activity by homeowners association in illinois 0.77
be on activity by homeowners association 0.77
be on criminal activity by homeowners association in illinois 0.76
be on criminal activity by homeowners association 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(complaint, be on activity)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on criminal activity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(complaint, be on criminal activity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(complaint, be on criminal activity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(complaint, be on criminal activity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(complaint, be on activity by homeowners association in illinois)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(complaint, be on criminal activity by homeowners association in illinois)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be on activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(complaint, be on activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(complaint, be on activity)