complaint: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents letter
Weight: 0.65
, evidence
Weight: 0.64
, meeting
Weight: 0.60
, email
Weight: 0.60
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.70
, problem
Weight: 0.63
, diarrhea
Weight: 0.63
, headache
Weight: 0.62
, argument
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
be good 0.87
be good for business 0.79
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(email, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(email, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(email, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(argument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diarrhea, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(email, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(diarrhea, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, is thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(diarrhea, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(argument, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(argument, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(argument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(argument, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(complaint, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(complaint, is thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(complaint, is thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(complaint, is thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(complaint, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(complaint, be good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(complaint, be good for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(complaint, be good for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(email, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diarrhea, is thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diarrhea, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(argument, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(argument, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(email, has quality good)