complex: is active map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compound
Weight: 0.58
, hebrews
Weight: 0.40
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, parking structure
Weight: 0.33
, historical site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is active map 1.00
is map 0.89
is active 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(site, is map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(complex, is active map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(site, is map)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(site, is map)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(site, is map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(complex, is active map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(complex, is active map)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(complex, is map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(complex, is map)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(complex, is map)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(complex, is active)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(complex, is active)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(complex, is active)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(complex, is map)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(complex, is active)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(complex, is active map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(complex, is active map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(site, is map)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(complex, is active map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(site, is map)