compliance: be with practices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents documentation
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
Siblings transparency
Weight: 0.32
, compatibility
Weight: 0.32
, consistency
Weight: 0.32
, attestation
Weight: 0.32
, integration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with practices 1.00
be with practices act 0.95
be with foreign practices 0.90
be with foreign practices act 0.88
be with corrupt practices 0.88
be with corrupt practices act 0.86
be with practices act of 1977 ensured 0.86
be with foreign corrupt practices 0.82
be with corrupt practices act of 1977 ensured 0.82
be with foreign practices act of 1977 ensured 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(compliance, be with practices)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with practices act)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with foreign practices)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with foreign practices act)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with corrupt practices)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with practices act)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(compliance, be with practices act)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with corrupt practices act)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with foreign corrupt practices)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with corrupt practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with foreign practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with corrupt practices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with foreign practices)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with corrupt practices act)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with foreign practices act)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with foreign corrupt practices)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(compliance, be with practices act)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(compliance, be with corrupt practices)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(compliance, be with corrupt practices)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(compliance, be with corrupt practices act)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with corrupt practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(compliance, be with foreign practices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(compliance, be with foreign practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(compliance, be with foreign practices)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(compliance, be with foreign corrupt practices)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(compliance, be with foreign practices act)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(compliance, be with practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(compliance, be with corrupt practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(compliance, be with corrupt practices act)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(compliance, be with foreign practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compliance, be with foreign practices act)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(compliance, be with foreign corrupt practices)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(compliance, be with practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(compliance, be with foreign practices act of 1977 ensured)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(compliance, be with corrupt practices act of 1977 ensured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(compliance, be with practices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(compliance, be with practices)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(compliance, be with practices)