composting: be in waste management

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.62 , way Weight: 0.61 , process Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.60 , practice Weight: 0.58
Siblings	compost Weight: 0.35 , waste Weight: 0.34 , gardening Weight: 0.34 , fermentation Weight: 0.33 , organic chemistry Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in waste management	1.00
is management	0.87
need management	0.85
reduce amount of solid waste	0.84
reduce amount of waste	0.84
reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill	0.83
reduce amount of solid waste placed	0.82
reduce amount of waste placed in landfill	0.82
be worse than animal waste	0.82
reduce amount of waste placed	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(process, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(composting, be in waste management)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(process, need management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(composting, be in waste management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(process, need management)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(process, is management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(process, is management)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(process, need management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(waste, is management)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(waste, be worse than animal waste)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(process, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(composting, be in waste management)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(process, need management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(composting, be in waste management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(waste, is management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(waste, is management)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(waste, be worse than animal waste) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waste, be worse than animal waste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(composting, be in waste management)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste placed)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste placed)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste placed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste placed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(composting, be in waste management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(process, need management)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(process, is management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(waste, is management)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(waste, be worse than animal waste)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(process, need management)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(composting, be in waste management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(process, is management)