composting: be to garden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to garden 1.00
be good for gardens 0.90
be good for for gardens 0.89
be valuable to gardeners 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for for gardens)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for gardens)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(compost, be valuable to gardeners)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(compost, be good for gardens)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for gardens)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(compost, be good for for gardens)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for for gardens)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(compost, be valuable to gardeners)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(compost, be valuable to gardeners)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(composting, be to garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(composting, be to garden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(compost, be good for gardens)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(compost, be good for for gardens)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(composting, be to garden)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compost, be valuable to gardeners)