composting: is sustainable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sustainable 1.00
be environmentally sustainable 0.92
affect conservation of biodiversity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(waste, affect conservation of biodiversity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(compost, is sustainable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gardening, is sustainable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(compost, be environmentally sustainable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(gardening, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(gardening, is sustainable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(compost, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(compost, is sustainable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(compost, be environmentally sustainable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(compost, be environmentally sustainable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(waste, affect conservation of biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(waste, affect conservation of biodiversity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(composting, is sustainable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(composting, is sustainable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(waste, affect conservation of biodiversity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(compost, be environmentally sustainable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(gardening, is sustainable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(composting, is sustainable)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(compost, is sustainable)