compression: affect pressure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
Siblings jitter
Weight: 0.34
, acceleration
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect pressure 1.00
affect way 0.79
affect quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, affect pressure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(viscosity, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(viscosity, affect pressure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(compression, affect pressure)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(compression, affect way)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(compression, affect quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(compression, affect way)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(compression, affect way)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(compression, affect way)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(compression, affect quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(compression, affect quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(compression, affect quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(compression, affect pressure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(compression, affect pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(compression, affect pressure)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(viscosity, affect pressure)