compression: be different cutting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.66
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.63
Siblings jitter
Weight: 0.34
, acceleration
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, amplitude
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different cutting 1.00
be different cutting in poem 0.83
cutting in poem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(compression, be different cutting)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(compression, be different cutting in poem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(compression, cutting in poem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(compression, be different cutting in poem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(compression, cutting in poem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(compression, cutting in poem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(compression, be different cutting in poem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(compression, cutting in poem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(compression, be different cutting in poem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(compression, be different cutting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(compression, be different cutting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(compression, be different cutting)