compromise: be important in process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.63
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
, provision
Weight: 0.59
, idea
Weight: 0.58
, marriage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, amendment
Weight: 0.34
, resolution
Weight: 0.34
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in process 1.00
be important in legislative process 0.84
be important in democricy 0.83
be important in government 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(compromise, be important in process)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important in legislative process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important in democricy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important in government)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(compromise, be important in democricy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(compromise, be important in legislative process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(compromise, be important in government)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important in democricy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important in legislative process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(compromise, be important in government)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in democricy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in legislative process)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in government)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(compromise, be important in process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(compromise, be important in process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(compromise, be important in process)