compromise: is dirty word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.63
, proposal
Weight: 0.62
, provision
Weight: 0.59
, idea
Weight: 0.58
, marriage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.35
, amendment
Weight: 0.34
, resolution
Weight: 0.34
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dirty word 1.00
is now dirty word 0.98
is dirty 0.91
is dirty word analysis 0.91
is now dirty word analysis 0.91
is now dirty word pdf 0.91
is dirty word pdf 0.91
is now dirty word summary 0.89
is dirty word summary 0.89
is word 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(compromise, is dirty word)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(compromise, is now dirty word)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(compromise, is word)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(compromise, is dirty word pdf)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(compromise, is word)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(compromise, is dirty word analysis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(compromise, is now dirty word pdf)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(compromise, is now dirty word analysis)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(compromise, is dirty)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(compromise, is dirty word summary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(compromise, is now dirty word summary)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(compromise, is dirty word pdf)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word pdf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word summary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(compromise, is dirty word summary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word analysis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(compromise, is word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(compromise, is dirty word analysis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is now dirty word summary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is now dirty word pdf)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is now dirty word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(compromise, is now dirty word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(compromise, is now dirty word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is now dirty word analysis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(compromise, is now dirty word pdf)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(compromise, is dirty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty word pdf)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is dirty)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(compromise, is now dirty word summary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty word summary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(compromise, is now dirty word analysis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(compromise, is now dirty word pdf)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty word analysis)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(compromise, is now dirty word summary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(compromise, is now dirty word analysis)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(compromise, is dirty word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(compromise, is dirty word)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(compromise, is dirty word)