computer architecture: be useful

Related concepts

Parents	computer science Weight: 0.78 , architecture Weight: 0.65 , course Weight: 0.64 , application Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mathematics Weight: 0.36 , programming language Weight: 0.35 , biology Weight: 0.34 , coding Weight: 0.34 , artificial intelligence Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be useful	1.00
is useful	0.99
be helpful	0.90
is helpful	0.89
be useful in future	0.88
be useful to man	0.86
be helpful in future	0.84
be useful in subjects	0.82
be useful in other subjects	0.81
is beneficial	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(course, is beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer science, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(computer science, be helpful)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(application, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(course, is beneficial)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(course, is beneficial)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be helpful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(coding, is beneficial)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(coding, is helpful)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(biology, be useful to man)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is useful)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(coding, is useful)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be helpful in future)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be useful in other subjects)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be useful in future)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(computer architecture, be useful)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(computer science, be helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(computer architecture, be useful)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(course, is beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(computer architecture, be useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(coding, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(coding, is useful)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(mathematics, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is useful)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(mathematics, be useful in future) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be useful in future)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(coding, is helpful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(coding, is helpful)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(biology, be useful to man) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(biology, be useful to man)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(mathematics, be helpful in future) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be helpful in future)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(mathematics, be useful in other subjects) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(mathematics, be useful in other subjects)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(coding, is beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(coding, is beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(computer architecture, be useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(computer science, be helpful)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(application, is useful)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(course, is beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(coding, is useful)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(mathematics, be useful in future)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(mathematics, is useful)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(mathematics, be helpful in future)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(mathematics, be useful in other subjects)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(coding, is helpful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(biology, be useful to man)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(coding, is beneficial)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(application, is useful)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(computer science, be helpful)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(course, is beneficial)