computer network: is legitimate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network
Weight: 0.83
, electronic device
Weight: 0.75
, computer
Weight: 0.71
Siblings computer virus
Weight: 0.79
, web site
Weight: 0.72
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.70
, printer
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is legitimate 1.00
is valid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is valid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer virus, is valid)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is valid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(computer network, is legitimate)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(computer network, is valid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer network, is valid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer network, is valid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is valid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is legitimate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer network, is legitimate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is legitimate)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(computer virus, is valid)