computer science: be hard for people

Related concepts

Parents	science Weight: 0.83 , technology Weight: 0.75 , computer program Weight: 0.74 , computer scientist Weight: 0.73
Siblings	mathematics Weight: 0.72 , programming language Weight: 0.67 , artificial intelligence Weight: 0.65 , biology Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be hard for people	1.00
be hard for many people	0.96
is hard	0.91
is hard major	0.80
is difficult	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(science, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for people)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(science, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(science, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(science, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(computer science, be hard for people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(mathematics, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(mathematics, is hard)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is hard)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(computer science, be hard for people)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(computer science, is hard)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for many people)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(computer science, is hard major)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is hard major)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(computer science, is difficult)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard major)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard major)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(computer science, is difficult)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(computer science, be hard for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(science, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(mathematics, is hard)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is difficult)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(computer science, be hard for people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(science, is hard)