computer science: be popular in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in india 1.00
be used in microsoft excel 0.76
is popular 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is popular)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(computer science, be popular in india)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(computer science, be used in microsoft excel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(computer science, be used in microsoft excel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(computer science, be used in microsoft excel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer science, is popular)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be used in microsoft excel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(computer science, be popular in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be popular in india)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is popular)