computer science: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.83
, technology
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.74
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.73
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.72
, programming language
Weight: 0.67
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.65
, biology
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good major 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer science, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer science, is good major)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is good major)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is good major)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is good major)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(computer science, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)