computer scientist: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.79
, scientist
Weight: 0.72
, specialist
Weight: 0.70
, science
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.73
, physicist
Weight: 0.70
, biologist
Weight: 0.55
, professor
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(specialist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer scientist, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(specialist, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(specialist, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(professor, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(specialist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(professor, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(professor, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(computer scientist, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer scientist, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialist, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(professor, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer scientist, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(specialist, has state jobs)