computer scientist: is rich

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.79
, scientist
Weight: 0.72
, specialist
Weight: 0.70
, science
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.73
, physicist
Weight: 0.70
, biologist
Weight: 0.55
, professor
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rich 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(physicist, is rich)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(physicist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(physicist, is rich)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(computer scientist, is rich)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, is rich)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer scientist, is rich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, is rich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(physicist, is rich)