computer scientist: need math

Related concepts

Parents	researcher Weight: 0.79 , scientist Weight: 0.72 , specialist Weight: 0.70 , science Weight: 0.69 , expert Weight: 0.68
Siblings	computer science Weight: 0.73 , physicist Weight: 0.70 , biologist Weight: 0.55 , professor Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
need math	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(computer science, need math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(computer science, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(computer science, need math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(computer scientist, need math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, need math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(computer scientist, need math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, need math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(computer science, need math)