computer virus: be considered dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.79
, computer
Weight: 0.78
, virus
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.64
Siblings trojan horse
Weight: 0.74
, worm
Weight: 0.66
, trojan
Weight: 0.62
, computer game
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.93
is harmful 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(virus, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virus, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(virus, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(virus, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(virus, is dangerous)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(virus, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(computer game, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(trojan, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(trojan horse, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(virus, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(virus, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(trojan, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(trojan, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(trojan horse, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(trojan horse, is dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(computer game, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(computer game, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(computer virus, be considered dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(computer virus, is dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer virus, is dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer virus, is harmful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer virus, is harmful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(virus, is harmful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(virus, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(trojan, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(trojan horse, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer game, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(virus, is dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(computer virus, be considered dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(virus, is harmful)