computer: be better than people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
, network device
Weight: 0.68
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, supercomputer
Weight: 0.75
, computer programming
Weight: 0.75
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than people 1.00
be better than new 0.91
be better than women 0.91
be better than man 0.89
be better than humans 0.88
be better than books 0.84
be smarter than humans 0.83
be faster than humans 0.83
be smaller than before 0.82
make better business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(computer, be better than people)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(computer, be better than man)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer, be better than man)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(computer, be better than man)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(computer, be better than man)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(computer, make better business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(computer, make better business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(computer, make better business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer, make better business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer, be better than people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer, be better than people)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer, be better than people)