computer: be expensive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.72
, computer network
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive 1.00
cost money 0.76
be outdated very quickly nowadays 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer hardware, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer, be expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer hardware, be expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, be expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer hardware, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(computer, be expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(computer, be expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(computer, cost money)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(computer, cost money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(computer, cost money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(computer, cost money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer, be expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer, be expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(computer, be expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer hardware, be expensive)