computer: be hard to use than be necessary

Related concepts

Parents	personal computer Weight: 0.79 , computer hardware Weight: 0.76 , digital camera Weight: 0.71 , mobile phone Weight: 0.67
Siblings	computer monitor Weight: 0.81 , computer virus Weight: 0.78 , computer programmer Weight: 0.74 , computer program Weight: 0.72 , computer network Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be hard to use than be necessary	1.00
be used to do lot of work	0.81
be used to do work	0.81
be used to get work do quickly	0.80
be fast but not smart than human	0.80
be difficult	0.79
do work	0.78
make us more productive	0.78
fail to work sometimes	0.77
be misuse just like any other machine	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(computer program, be difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(computer program, be difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(computer program, be difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(computer, be difficult)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(computer, be difficult)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(computer, be difficult)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(computer, do work)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(computer, do work)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(computer, do work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(computer, do work)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(computer, be difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(computer, be hard to use than be necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(computer, be hard to use than be necessary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(computer program, be difficult)