concession: be vs price reduction

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, change
Weight: 0.57
, facility
Weight: 0.56
Siblings brat
Weight: 0.44
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.33
, compromise
Weight: 0.32
, license
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs price reduction 1.00
is vs price 0.91
be vs seller credit 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(concession, be vs price reduction)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(concession, is vs price)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(concession, is vs price)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(concession, be vs seller credit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(concession, is vs price)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concession, be vs seller credit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(concession, be vs seller credit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(concession, is vs price)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(concession, be vs seller credit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(concession, be vs price reduction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(concession, be vs price reduction)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(concession, be vs price reduction)