condensation: form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.58
, reaction
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.54
Siblings mildew
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.33
, moisture
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
form 1.00
be necessary clouds form 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mildew, form)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(oxidation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(oxidation, form)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(mildew, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mildew, form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(condensation, form)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(condensation, be necessary clouds form)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(condensation, be necessary clouds form)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(condensation, be necessary clouds form)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(condensation, be necessary clouds form)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condensation, form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(condensation, form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oxidation, form)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(condensation, form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mildew, form)