condenser: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.62
, apparatus
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.58
, application
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings compressor
Weight: 0.35
, ventilation
Weight: 0.34
, transformer
Weight: 0.34
, piping
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(compressor, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(compressor, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(compressor, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(condenser, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(condenser, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(condenser, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(condenser, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(compressor, go bad)