condo: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.64
, space
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, property
Weight: 0.56
Siblings condominium
Weight: 0.38
, townhouse
Weight: 0.37
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.35
, apartment
Weight: 0.35
, duplex
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at washington 0.76
be at chicago 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at washington)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(townhouse, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at new york)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(condominium, be at washington) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at washington)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(condo, be at new york)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(condo, be at chicago)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(condo, be at chicago)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(condo, be at chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(condo, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(condominium, be at washington)