condo: is bad investment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.64
, space
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.56
, property
Weight: 0.56
Siblings townhouse
Weight: 0.37
, apartment building
Weight: 0.35
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.35
, apartment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad investment 1.00
has trait investment 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate, has trait investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condo, is bad investment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(real estate, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condo, is bad investment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(real estate, is bad investment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(real estate, has trait investment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(real estate, is bad investment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has trait investment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(real estate, has trait investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(condo, is bad investment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(real estate, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(condo, is bad investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(condo, is bad investment)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(condo, has trait investment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(condo, has trait investment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(condo, has trait investment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(condo, has trait investment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(condo, is bad investment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(condo, is bad investment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(real estate, is bad investment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, has trait investment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(real estate, is bad investment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(condo, is bad investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, has trait investment)