congo: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be considered state 0.84
has state third 0.81
is failed state 0.77
have government 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(zambia, has state third)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mali, has state third)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mali, has state third) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(mali, has state third)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(zambia, has state third) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(zambia, has state third)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(congo, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state third)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(congo, be considered state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(congo, is failed state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(congo, be considered state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(congo, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mali, has state third)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(congo, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zambia, has state third)