congo: have hot climate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hot climate 1.00
have climate 0.92
is rainforest hot 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(zambia, have climate)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(latin america, have climate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(latin america, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(latin america, have climate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(zambia, have climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(zambia, have climate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(congo, have hot climate)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(congo, have climate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(congo, have climate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(congo, have climate)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(congo, have climate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(congo, is rainforest hot)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(congo, have hot climate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(congo, have hot climate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(latin america, have climate)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(congo, have hot climate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(zambia, have climate)