conifer: have shaped cone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
, evergreen
Weight: 0.50
, shrub
Weight: 0.50
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings juniper
Weight: 0.74
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.73
, cedar
Weight: 0.70
, pine
Weight: 0.67
, pine tree
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
have shaped cone 1.00
be conical in shape 0.80
have cones 0.79
have needle shaped leaves 0.79
have pine cones 0.78
have cones at top 0.78
have cones years 0.78
make cones 0.78
have two types of cones 0.77
produce cones 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(conifer, have shaped cone)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(evergreen, have pine cones)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pine, have needle shaped leaves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, produce cones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have cones years)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pine, have cones at top)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, be conical in shape)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(douglas fir, make cones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have pine cones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(evergreen, have pine cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(pine tree, have pine cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have pine cones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(douglas fir, make cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(douglas fir, make cones)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pine, be conical in shape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pine, be conical in shape)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pine, have needle shaped leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pine, have needle shaped leaves)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pine, have cones at top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pine, have cones at top)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pine tree, have two types of cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have two types of cones)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pine tree, produce cones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pine tree, produce cones)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pine tree, have cones years) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have cones years)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(conifer, have shaped cone)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(conifer, have needle shaped leaves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have needle shaped leaves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(conifer, have needle shaped leaves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(conifer, have needle shaped leaves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(conifer, have cones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have cones)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(conifer, have cones)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(conifer, have cones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(conifer, have shaped cone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(evergreen, have pine cones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(pine tree, have pine cones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(douglas fir, make cones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pine tree, produce cones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pine, have needle shaped leaves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pine, be conical in shape)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pine tree, have cones years)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pine, have cones at top)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pine tree, have two types of cones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(conifer, have shaped cone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(evergreen, have pine cones)