conifer: living in taiga

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.68 , deciduous tree Weight: 0.55 , evergreen Weight: 0.50 , shrub Weight: 0.50 , topic Weight: 0.46
Siblings	juniper Weight: 0.74 , douglas fir Weight: 0.73 , cedar Weight: 0.70 , pine Weight: 0.67 , pine tree Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
living in taiga	1.00
be adapted living in taiga	0.94
living in grasslands	0.79
survive winters of subarctic	0.79
be adapted living in grasslands	0.78
survive cold winters of subarctic	0.78
survive bitter winters of subarctic	0.77
survive bitter cold winters of subarctic	0.76
make living	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(species, make living) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(species, make living)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Remarkable(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(species, make living)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(species, be adapted living in grasslands) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(species, make living) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(conifer, living in taiga)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(conifer, living in taiga)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(conifer, be adapted living in taiga)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(conifer, be adapted living in taiga)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(conifer, be adapted living in taiga)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(conifer, be adapted living in taiga)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Salient(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(conifer, living in taiga)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(species, make living)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(species, be adapted living in grasslands)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter winters of subarctic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive winters of subarctic)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive bitter cold winters of subarctic)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(evergreen, survive cold winters of subarctic)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(species, make living)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(conifer, living in taiga) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(species, be adapted living in grasslands)