conjugation: be considered process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, modification
Weight: 0.46
, topic
Weight: 0.46
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.32
, fermentation
Weight: 0.32
, meiosis
Weight: 0.32
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered process 1.00
be considered sexual process 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, be considered process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fermentation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fermentation, be considered process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(conjugation, be considered process)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(conjugation, be considered sexual process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(conjugation, be considered sexual process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conjugation, be considered sexual process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(conjugation, be considered sexual process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(conjugation, be considered process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(conjugation, be considered process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(conjugation, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fermentation, be considered process)