connecticut: be good place visit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, town
Weight: 0.63
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place visit 1.00
be good place live 0.84
be good place build 0.82
be bad place live 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(massachusetts, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new york, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be good place live)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be good place visit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(washington, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(massachusetts, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new york city, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(new york city, be good place visit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(washington, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(washington, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(philadelphia, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(maryland, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(las vegas, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(connecticut, be good place visit)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(connecticut, be good place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(connecticut, be good place build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place live)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(connecticut, be bad place live)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place build)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new york city, be good place visit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(washington, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(philadelphia, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(connecticut, be good place visit)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be good place live)