conservation: apply to holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
apply to holes 1.00
apply to black holes 0.97
apply to life 0.80
apply to changes 0.79
apply to changes of matter 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(concept, apply to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(concept, apply to life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(concept, apply to life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(concept, apply to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(conservation, apply to holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(conservation, apply to holes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to black holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(conservation, apply to black holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to changes of matter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(conservation, apply to changes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(conservation, apply to changes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, apply to black holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to changes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to changes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(conservation, apply to changes of matter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to black holes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(conservation, apply to changes of matter)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to changes of matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, apply to holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, apply to life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(conservation, apply to holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(concept, apply to life)