conservative party: be called wing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.87
, party
Weight: 0.84
, critic
Weight: 0.61
, opposition
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings labour party
Weight: 0.44
, democratic party
Weight: 0.42
, tory
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called wing 1.00
be called right wing 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tory, be called wing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tory, be called right wing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tory, be called right wing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tory, be called right wing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tory, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tory, be called wing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(conservative party, be called wing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(conservative party, be called right wing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called right wing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(conservative party, be called right wing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called right wing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(conservative party, be called wing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tory, be called wing)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(conservative party, be called wing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tory, be called right wing)