conservatory: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.61
, room
Weight: 0.61
, addition
Weight: 0.60
, window
Weight: 0.53
, feature
Weight: 0.49
Siblings greenhouse
Weight: 0.34
, concert hall
Weight: 0.34
, hall
Weight: 0.34
, entrance hall
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(room, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conservatory, get hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conservatory, get hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(room, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(room, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(room, get hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(room, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, get hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(room, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(conservatory, get hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(room, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(conservatory, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(greenhouse, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(greenhouse, get hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(greenhouse, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(greenhouse, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(conservatory, get hot)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(conservatory, is hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(conservatory, is hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(conservatory, is hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(conservatory, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, get hot)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(room, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(greenhouse, get hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(greenhouse, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(room, get hot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(conservatory, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(room, is hot)