construction: has trait industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, expansion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.73
, excavation
Weight: 0.63
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.58
, completion
Weight: 0.56
, beam
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait industry 1.00
has trait investments 0.82
is secondary industry 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(project, has trait investments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(construction, has trait industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(project, has trait investments)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has trait investments)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(project, has trait investments) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(construction, has trait industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(construction, has trait industry)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(construction, is secondary industry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(construction, is secondary industry)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction, is secondary industry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(construction, is secondary industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction, has trait industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(construction, has trait industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(project, has trait investments)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(construction, has trait industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(project, has trait investments)