construction: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.61
, expansion
Weight: 0.61
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.73
, excavation
Weight: 0.63
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.58
, completion
Weight: 0.56
, beam
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00
is important to 0.78
be important in archaeology 0.77
is useful 0.76
be useful 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(expansion, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(construction, is interesting)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(expansion, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(construction, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(expansion, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(expansion, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(expansion, is useful)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(excavation, be important in archaeology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(excavation, is important to)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(expansion, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(construction, is interesting)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(expansion, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(construction, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(excavation, is important to) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(excavation, is important to)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(excavation, be important in archaeology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(excavation, be important in archaeology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(construction, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(construction, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(expansion, be useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(expansion, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(excavation, is important to)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(excavation, be important in archaeology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(expansion, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(construction, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(expansion, be useful)