constructivism: be vs essentialism

Related concepts

Parents	theory Weight: 0.69 , approach Weight: 0.60 , movement Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.55 , concept Weight: 0.52
Siblings	anarchism Weight: 0.35 , structuralism Weight: 0.35 , relativity Weight: 0.34 , formalism Weight: 0.34 , quantum physics Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be vs essentialism	1.00
be vs constructionism	0.87
be vs functionalism	0.86
be vs functionalism psychology	0.86
be vs hypothesis	0.81
be vs poststructuralism	0.80
be vs subject	0.77
be vs relativity	0.77
be vs law	0.77
be vs theme	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(theory, be vs hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(topic, be vs subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(topic, be vs theme) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(theory, be vs law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(theory, be vs hypothesis)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(theory, be vs law)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(topic, be vs subject)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(topic, be vs theme)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(theory, be vs law)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(topic, be vs theme)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(theory, be vs hypothesis)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(topic, be vs subject)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be vs functionalism psychology)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be vs poststructuralism)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be vs functionalism)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(relativity, be vs relativity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(theory, be vs hypothesis) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(topic, be vs subject) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(theory, be vs law) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(topic, be vs theme) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(structuralism, be vs functionalism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be vs functionalism)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(structuralism, be vs functionalism psychology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be vs functionalism psychology)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(structuralism, be vs poststructuralism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be vs poststructuralism)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(relativity, be vs relativity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(relativity, be vs relativity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs constructionism)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs constructionism)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(constructivism, be vs constructionism)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(constructivism, be vs constructionism)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Salient(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(topic, be vs subject)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(topic, be vs theme)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(theory, be vs hypothesis)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(theory, be vs law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(structuralism, be vs functionalism)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(structuralism, be vs poststructuralism)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(relativity, be vs relativity)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(structuralism, be vs functionalism psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(topic, be vs subject)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(topic, be vs theme)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(theory, be vs hypothesis)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(constructivism, be vs essentialism) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(theory, be vs law)